|
U.S. Catholics split on
future of their faith
By Eric Gorski and Felisa
Cardona
Denver Post Staff Writers
 |
|
Special / Jack Dempsey |
|
Denver's
Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception |
|
|
|
As the princes of the Roman Catholic Church prepare
to elect a successor to Pope John Paul II, the church in
the United States remains a house divided.
Some Catholics pray for another strong-willed figure
to continue John Paul's vision of evangelization through
strict adherence to church teachings.
Others look for a man who could usher in an era of
reform, perhaps allowing freer debate of Catholic
thought or reconsidering the celibate, male- only
priesthood, seeing that so many parishes lack priests.
The clergy sexual-abuse crisis, advancing secularism
and the role of laypeople and women also rank high as
issues in the U.S. church.
Although the largest faith group in the U.S., the
nation's 64.3 million Catholics represent only 6 percent
of Catholics worldwide. Experts say, however, that the
U.S. church wields influence because of its wealth and
because the Vatican admires its democratic ideals.
At the same time, U.S. issues such as divorce and
women's ordination are not priorities globally and are
unlikely to be discussed any time soon because John Paul
II spoke so definitively on them, experts say.
George Weigel, a Catholic theologian and senior
fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center in
Washington, argues that despite talk of division, the
U.S. church is the most vibrant in the developed world.
He sees an important generational shift in seminaries
and religious orders that form church culture.
"The generation of '60s dissent is getting old and
gray and is not replicating itself," he said. "That
generation is still in control of a lot of universities,
but younger scholars are simply not interested in that."
Denver seeing shift
In many ways, Denver is an incubator for this new
brand of orthodox Catholicism.
Archbishop Charles Chaput's profile is growing in a
school of thought that says "real Catholics must follow
church teachings"; groups for orthodox Catholic women
and college students have germinated here; and pious
young adults fill the pews every Sunday night at a
downtown cathedral to hear Chaput preach.
"I would like the new pope to be faithful to the
teachings of the church," said Lexie Wagner, a student
at the University of Colorado at Boulder who is active
in a campus Respect Life group. "Most teachings people
would like to see change, but the theology behind those
teachings may never change. Youth in America have really
started to realize that."
That is not necessarily true on a national level. A
study this year in Commonweal magazine found that
young-adult Catholics are even more progressive on
abortion, gay marriage and the priesthood than their
predecessors were in 1978 when Pope John Paul II was
elected.Tom Kerwin, a Catholic and a retired lawyer
from Denver, believes the priest shortage will force the
church to open the priesthood to married people and
women, though he believes the latter will take longer.
"For years, (church leaders) have mistreated women
and managed women as if they were children," said Kerwin,
74. "It may be hard for men who have had it their way
all these years."
Yet expectations are lower in the U.S. church's
reform wing because John Paul II reigned for so long.
His ideological brothers-in-arms are cardinals, bishops,
priests and seminarians.
"The best we can hope for at this point is that we
get a pope who is more of a listener than the previous
pope," said Linda Pieczynski of the Catholic reform
group Call to Action. "... Instead of a strong
authoritarian disciplinarian, we get someone who
recognizes there are actually good things that come out
of people disagreeing."
While some Catholics yearn for a broader role for
women, others say John Paul II made extraordinary
progress. Last year, he named a U.S. nun and a German
laywoman to the Vatican's top theology group and
appointed an Italian nun as undersecretary of a Vatican
congregation. Women hold more than one- quarter of the
top positions in U.S. Catholic dioceses, working as
school superintendents and financial managers.
Mary Ann Glendon, a Harvard University law professor,
was appointed by John Paul II in 2004 to head the
Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, an advisory
panel. Glendon said in Rome last week that U.S.
Catholics are too concerned about roles inside the
church and should seek to influence culture in their
areas of expertise, such as politics, law or education.
"We're a church where the roles of women have
expanded tremendously and will continue to do so," she
said. "But the main role for women and all laypeople is
going to be in the secular sphere."
What's more important?
U.S. Catholics also stand divided over the idea of a
hierarchy of church teachings.
Sister Pat McCormick of the Sisters of Loretto in
Denver supports a "seamless garment," in which issues
from conception to natural death carry the same weight
as war, AIDS and the death penalty.
Other Catholics believe some issues should be
elevated above others. Chaput, for example, in 2004
called abortion the pre-eminent issue for Catholic
voters.
"I don't think everything should be emphasized
equally," said Mark Bauman, retired president of Starz
Encore and chairman of the Catholic Foundation in
Denver. "'Thou shall not kill' is a whole lot more
important than 'Thou shall not steal."'
In reality all U.S. Catholics are "cafeteria
Catholics," said David Gibson, author of "The Coming
Catholic Church." Liberals oppose the death penalty and
support workers' rights and economic justice.
Conservatives fight abortion, gay marriage and stem-cell
research.
Gibson does not believe the U.S. church will become
smaller and more orthodox as tradition-minded bishops
crack the whip on dissent.
"What you're going to get is a smaller, more orthodox
priesthood, which will be more at odds with the flock,"
he said.
Catholic laypeople say the clergy abuse scandal is
the most serious problem facing the U.S. church, polls
show. The next pope could decentralize power to allow
local bishops to act more decisively in the future.
"It would be an absolute disaster if a new pope said
the scandal was a creation of the media and sent
(abusive) priests back into churches," said the Rev. Tom
Reese, editor of the Jesuit magazine America. "The U.S.
church would never recover."
U.S. cardinals have said the next pope should stand
ready to tackle interfaith relations, rising secularism,
care for the poor and bioethics issues.
Inside the Vatican, there is some incredulity when
Catholics talk about changes a new pope might bring.
Calls for reform underscore what many in the Roman
curia and beyond perceive as major problem in the U.S.
church: that despite being the world's most educated
laity, U.S. Catholics are poorly educated in the faith.
Consider the priesthood, said Archbishop Michael
Miller, secretary of the Congregation for Catholic
Education.
John Paul II settled the question in a 1994 letter
saying Jesus had anointed only men as apostles and that
the church "has no authority whatsoever" to ordain
women, Miller said.
But married male priests are within the bounds of
discussion, he said, because they already serve in
Eastern rite Catholic churches, which are self-governing
but are in full communion with the Roman church.
"I sometimes marvel when people say, 'The next pope
will do this or that,"' Miller said. "Who do they think
the next pope is? He's only the pope. He's not Jesus. He
can't overturn the Christian tradition.
"You're not going to get a pope who doesn't believe
in the sacredness of human life," he said. "You're not
going to get a pope who's going to say, 'Yeah, we're
going to ordain women.' That's never going to happen.
Those things can't happen."
|